The race to declare the need to distinctly regulate AI software fails to acknowledge all that is regulated and how we got to software opportunity in the first place.
I enjoyed the post. But I wonder if the power of AI in the hands of a desperate State, or institution, or individual can be harnessed to invent a weapon of destruction that is so innovative that counter measures can not be created in time to prevent the damage it could inflict?
The only thing I can see potentially needing some add-on regulatory attention, and here I'm speaking of AI-enabled medical tech - think provider assists in EHRs- is traceability of results. ie. ensuring that recommendations/responses reliably and **transparently** follow the evidence.
But then, I suppose this is just an extension to the current regs around traceability, isn't it?
It's a fascinating time for s/w. Makes me wish I was 20 years earlier in my career....
I enjoyed the post. But I wonder if the power of AI in the hands of a desperate State, or institution, or individual can be harnessed to invent a weapon of destruction that is so innovative that counter measures can not be created in time to prevent the damage it could inflict?
The only thing I can see potentially needing some add-on regulatory attention, and here I'm speaking of AI-enabled medical tech - think provider assists in EHRs- is traceability of results. ie. ensuring that recommendations/responses reliably and **transparently** follow the evidence.
But then, I suppose this is just an extension to the current regs around traceability, isn't it?
It's a fascinating time for s/w. Makes me wish I was 20 years earlier in my career....